![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRood-e6L_9krhG-R0u4T_RWCgUAisWczAGk45RWAyAGJTNrHkVl49vpJ9OG0JS-gYwY2XZPBebO968aJD-OudwLgeUbQqWWg4cfZ0ddV6rIJN7mbcYxNo6gIIKDHQvQ9LCKd80n5bVOs/s320/liquify+dilemma.jpg)
So, if you read this blog or know me, you probably have heard or see by my recent posts that I'm trying to do more portraits and people photos. While pelicans in flight are still near and dear to my heart, it's time to branch out into the world of lighting and models. With that comes the pretty ominous task of facial retouching and postprocessing, or more specifically how much is acceptable? I posted the photo above left about two weeks ago --- a perfectly lovely young girl who Larry and I photographed at Dickens on the Strand. The photo on the right? Well, there's this tool in Photoshop called the Liquify tool, and it's not one that I use too often on pelicans. Literally, with a couple of clicks of the mouse you can take 15 pounds off the subject. Now, I ask: is it practical for the portrait photographer to do this to every shot? Would it increase your business if you were making a living from this or would it just increase your workload with no real payback? Would subjects be so thrilled, would you get more business? Anyway, I'd love to hear your opinions about this dilemma, and if you're a portrait photographer how you handle this. Please click to see the full size version, and feel free to comment...